I must say that I really do like the different input samples used, such as Otyrar.
Well done for providing a nuanced picture that fully encapsulates the different possibilities that may represent ethnogenesis in Anatolia. I look forward to more of your work!
Thank you Azadmard! As a note, I did not use the three ancient Iranic populations to see the possibilities per se. For instance, I do not think that migration of a genetically Sarmatian-like population might be the main linguo-genetic source of modern Western Iranics. What I have tried to show is how consistent the results are. When we compare the results with these three different Iranic sources, we can see that the conclusions of our previous article are quite satisfying even though we had used mixed data types.
I must say that I really do like the different input samples used, such as Otyrar.
Well done for providing a nuanced picture that fully encapsulates the different possibilities that may represent ethnogenesis in Anatolia. I look forward to more of your work!
Thank you Azadmard! As a note, I did not use the three ancient Iranic populations to see the possibilities per se. For instance, I do not think that migration of a genetically Sarmatian-like population might be the main linguo-genetic source of modern Western Iranics. What I have tried to show is how consistent the results are. When we compare the results with these three different Iranic sources, we can see that the conclusions of our previous article are quite satisfying even though we had used mixed data types.
This shit is low key bussin bussin